linerinno.blogg.se

Face of mars debunked
Face of mars debunked












  1. FACE OF MARS DEBUNKED PROFESSIONAL
  2. FACE OF MARS DEBUNKED SERIES

To produce a cloud matching the size of the feature in the video would require something much larger than the Tsar Bomba, which took out a large number of satellites. Above-ground tests tend to fry satellites within line of sight, so pictures are taken by mechanical film cameras, digital is out of the question as is electronically controlled film cameras like most early spy satellites. While trying to find a picture of a nuclear test from space, it occurs to me there's a reason none exist: EMP.

face of mars debunked

Of these claims, and the only time it was even a theoretical possibility was this one in which they actually delayed cutting a live feed to get what they hoped would be a stunning moonrise (but turned out to be more of a blurry gray turd).Įdit: More on mushroom clouds from space. The "cut off the live feed" claim accompanies every.

FACE OF MARS DEBUNKED SERIES

For that matter, the video was not captured as a video, but was a series of still images assembled into a video for release to the media The video was not even from Sliding Spring's encounterĥ. This video was not from NASA but the Indian Space Research Organizationģ. A big one is the claim that, "NASA cut off the live feed" just before Sliding Spring's closest approach, however:Ģ. I believe a nuclear explosion on Mars should more closely resemble a high altitude test such as this.Ī bunch of other minor points in the video make no sense. High altitude tests (starting around 30 km, where the atmosphere is still thicker than Mars' "sea" level) do not normally form mushroom clouds, but spherical ones, like this one from Hardtack I Teak (altitude ~50 km, the closest test picture I can find to the atmospheric pressure at Mars ground level, which is around ~45 km):

FACE OF MARS DEBUNKED PROFESSIONAL

It also follows ground features.Īlso, I can't find much professional information about what a nuclear weapon would do on Mars, but it's really important to remember that mushroom clouds are an effect of Earth's thick atmosphere and gravity, both of which are much lower on Mars. This feature is mushroom shaped but sideways parallel to the ground - no explosion of any type can do that. Because the mushroom is vertical, you don't see the stalk unless it's very near the terminator, where it may not be visible at all. So, if anybody ellse can help me out with info,would be greatly appreciatedĪ mushroom cloud from space looks almost flat and barely above the ground, so all you see is a circular feature. Then i also used google earths mars imagery for comparison I've done some investigating, my opinion is that it is not a cloud but just a different colour make up on the image

face of mars debunked

Now this story is spreading like fire all over the globe. He said looking at high-resolution images of the same part of the canyon, showed the "cloud" was nothing more than an optical illusion at the junction of a crater with the trench. The image shows a huge mushroom cloud and we may wonder whether it is an enormous rare dust wind cloud, or caused due to a nuclear or methane explosion."ĭr Jonti Horner, astronomer at the University of Southern Queensland, Australia, said: "Fun as it would be to imagine that this is evidence of nuclear weapons on Mars, or even the impact of a chunk of Comet Siding Spring smashing into the planet, that’s sadly just not the case.” Sub titles on the video say: "India's Mars orbiter captured something strange in the gigantic Valles Marineris Canyon of Mars.

face of mars debunked

UFO buffs claim this formation on the surface of Mars could be a nuclear bomb blast on camera.














Face of mars debunked